Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.6 Terra, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.6 Terra
Live dataset updated 10/13/2026, 6:04:47 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-5.6 Terra OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #33 | #27 |
| Index score | 73.0 | 76.4 |
| Evidence | Estimated1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (72%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (28%); shrunk 3.7 toward the measured corpus | Measured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards |
| Input / 1M | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M | $10.00 | $12.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Providers | 2 | 3 |
| Weight access | No linked weights | No linked weights |
Decision facts
- Gemini 4 Argon is #33; GPT-5.6 Terra is #27 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 73.0 for Gemini 4 Argon and 76.4 for GPT-5.6 Terra. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Gemini 4 Argon is Estimated; GPT-5.6 Terra is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for Gemini 4 Argon and $12.00 for GPT-5.6 Terra. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $9.00 for Gemini 4 Argon versus $10.00 for GPT-5.6 Terra. Gemini 4 Argon costs 10.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 4 Argon and 1,050,000 for GPT-5.6 Terra.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 4 Argon and 3 for GPT-5.6 Terra.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6.1 Sol#8 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Wonder#8 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #9 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #9 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3#3 vs #9 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.