Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #12); and Kimi K3 is 1.3× cheaper per output token ($15.00/1M vs $20.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #12 (98.6 vs 84.0 points).
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 93.3% against 60.4%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 57.6 against 43.6.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 61.4% against 46.9%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Opus 5.5 was listed 22 September 2026, Kimi K3 16 July 2026.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • API cost matters — $15.00/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 1.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $3.00/1M against $4.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 17 listed API providers against 5.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicKimi K3Moonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#1#12
Index score98.684.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$3.00
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$15.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens128K944K
API providers listed517
Weight accessAPI onlyRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video
First listed22 September 202616 July 2026
PublisherAnthropicMoonshot AI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3 has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5Kimi K3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15381530–1547MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena6.2%5.6%–6.8%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%High60.4%MaxClaude Opus 5.5
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis57.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified43.6intelligence-index:v4.3:maxClaude Opus 5.5
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis61.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)":reasoning=true46.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Kimi K3 (max)":reasoning=trueClaude Opus 5.5
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench54.5Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Kimi K3?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #1 against #12. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on output tokens: $15.00/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and $3.00/1M for Kimi K3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $13.50 for Kimi K3. Kimi K3 costs 25.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Kimi K3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3 open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: API only. Kimi K3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and Kimi K3?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 17 for Kimi K3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further