Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Muse Wonder (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 12 October 2026

As of 12 October 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #6).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #6 (87.2 vs 83.0 points).
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 1.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 57.6 against 52.4.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 61.4% against 50.1%.

Choose Muse Wonder if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Wonder was listed 12 October 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 22 September 2026.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicMuse WonderMeta
ModelCap Index position#1#6
Index score87.283.0
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$4.00
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$20.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap128K944K
API providers listed51
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video, File, Audio
First listed22 September 202612 October 2026
PublisherAnthropicMeta

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (69%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (31%); shrunk 0.2 up toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Wonder has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5Muse WonderLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)15071499–1515High—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15501534–1565High—Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena14.3%12.2%–16.5%High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis57.6Reasoning52.4MaxClaude Opus 5.5
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis61.4%Reasoning50.1%MaxClaude Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)64.9%61.7%–68.0%Claude Code · Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Muse Wonder?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 12 October 2026: #1 against #6. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Muse Wonder?

Both list the same output price, $20.00/1M tokens, with input at $4.00/1M and $4.00/1M respectively. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $18.00 for Muse Wonder. The listed-rate totals are equal. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Wonder?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Wonder?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: No linked weights. Muse Wonder: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Wonder?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 1 for Muse Wonder, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 12 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further