Skip to content
ModelCap

Muse Wonder

NewNo linked weights

Meta·#6 of 351 on the current board·cheaper than #2 Claude Fable 5.1

Muse Wonder is a language model from Meta. It ranks #6 of 351 on ModelCap's current board, with an Index score of 83.0, modeled from the publisher's launch results against measured models. Its score range of 66.4–99.7 spans positions #1–#51. It is listed at $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens from one provider. It reads up to 1M tokens of context, with no downloadable weights linked in the current source data.

Figures as of 12 Oct 2026, 17:32 UTC · download the public dataset · methodology

ModelCap Index · Current board
83.0#6
Modeled from the publisher's launch results against measured models · range 66.4–99.7
Market Gravity
21.6
Secondary market signal
Input
$4.00
per 1M tokens
Output
$20.00
per 1M tokens
Context
1M
tokens
Providers
1
endpoint

Providers

Uptime measured over the last 30 minutes
ProviderInputOutputContextQuantUptime
Meta$4.00$20.001M—100.0%

ModelCap Index · Current board

Methodology
83.0
Modeled from the publisher's launch results against measured models
Current board
#6 of 351
Score range
66.4–99.7
Rank range
#1–#51
Technical details
Public rank basis
Modeled · peer benchmarks (architecture)
Evidence label
Modeled · peer benchmarks · 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (69%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (31%); shrunk 0.2 up toward the measured corpus
Index support
11.5% · weak
Identity binding
Exact catalogue product · meta/meta/muse-wonder · aggregates disclosed benchmark configurations · endpoint configuration not claimed
Index observations used
0
Qualified Index evidence point
83.0
How this position was produced · fused launch placement

No general-family board lists this model yet. Its point estimate is the precision-weighted mean of every channel that spoke for it; each channel’s share is the weight it carried. Independent measurements replace this placement as boards list the model.

Fused estimate
83.0 ± 13.0
Independent share
0%
Shrink toward corpus
+0.2
Optimism haircut
None applied
Method
precision-weighted-v1
Channels fused into this model’s launch placement
ChannelEstimateShare
Corpus ladder · not independent
1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders
82.8 ± 15.769%
Publisher corpus prior · not independent
publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors
83.5 ± 23.431%
Bayesian Evidence Score · measured evidence input only

BES normalizes admitted public benchmark evidence for measured Index rows. Its legacy score and observables prior do not define the public language rank.

Observed capability
—
Evidence status
No admitted measured evidence
General preference
—
Coding
—
Agents & tools
—
Reasoning
—
Evidence breadth
0%
Evidence coverage
0%
Market and catalogue signals · secondary, never the language Index rank
Usage (OpenRouter popularity)
0.3
Liquidity (providers × uptime)
35.7
Open reach (HF downloads)
—
Surface (context / tools / modalities)
100.0
Freshness
99.9
  • · OpenRouter popularity #327
  • · 1 live provider
  • · Catalogue: context 1048576, reasoning, tools, modalities Text/Image/Video/File/Audio
  • · First seen 2026-10-12

These adoption and deployment observations remain context only. They do not change this model's ModelCap Index score or rank.

The bounded 0–100 capability score blends each source’s competitive placement with its published achievement, then combines capability families. Evidence breadth adds a modest uncertainty adjustment; price and popularity are not part of benchmark-led rank.

Experimental capability estimate

Estimate policy
Estimator abstained

insufficient-artifact-metadata

Feature coverage
86%
Training support
220 models · 125 lineages

insufficient-artifact-metadata. This layer predicts from admitted evidence and safe metadata only. It never enters ModelCap Score or rank.

Deployment readiness

Metadata index
30.1
limited · 38% metadata coverage
Not capability
Artifact reproducibility
0.0
Access & legal clarity
30.3
Deployability
80.0
Evaluation provenance
0.0

Not yet published: a pinned repository revision, the architecture and model type, a parameter count, safetensors weight metadata, the base model it derives from, a declared licence, a link to the licence terms, admitted benchmark results, results across several capability areas, results from more than one source, a confident match to its benchmark entries, pinned evaluation dataset versions.

A metadata completeness and deployability index—not a safety certification, quality grade, or production-readiness claim.

Market activity

Venue coverage
Market Gravity
21.6
OpenRouter weekly popularity
#327 of 333

Market Gravity uses OpenRouter’s full-catalogue popularity order. Sparse Vercel top-ten observations appear only when published and do not affect the score.

Arena preference

No matched Arena rating

This model is visible because it is available in the live catalogue, but it has no trustworthy community result yet. ModelCap does not infer a quality score from price, features, or market activity.

Market Gravity breakdown

Usage55%
0.3

OpenRouter weekly popularity across the full model catalogue.

Liquidity25%
35.7

Independent providers versus the model's open or closed cohort, weighted by uptime.

Open reach15%
50.0

Hugging Face 30-day downloads for open models; neutral for closed models.

Freshness5%
99.9

Time since first public availability, on a six-month half-life.

Specification

Model ID
meta/muse-wonder
Context window
1M tokens
Declared output cap
944K tokens

OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified. OpenRouter metadata

Inputs
Text, Image, Video, File, Audio
Outputs
Text
Tokenizer
Other
Cached input tokens
$0.20 / 1M
First seen on OpenRouter
12 Oct 2026

Capabilities

  • Supported: Reasoning
  • Supported: Tool use
  • Supported: Structured output
  • Supported: Response format
  • Supported: Moderated

Compare Muse Wonder with

Pick any model

Benchmark leaderboards featuring Muse Wonder

All leaderboards
Public benchmark boards on which Muse Wonder has a published result
LeaderboardScoreSource rankConfigurationPublished
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis52.4#10 of 207Max12 Oct 2026
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis50.1%#24 of 657Max12 Oct 2026

Alternatives to Muse Wonder, by the numbers

Ranked neighbours

Models within 3 places of #6 on the ModelCap Index.

Cheaper at a similar or higher Index

Index score within 3 points of, or above, this model's, with a lower listed blended price (3:1 input:output).

Other ranked Meta models

The same publisher's other current models with a public Index position.

Muse Wonder: common questions

How does Muse Wonder rank among AI models?

Muse Wonder holds ModelCap Index position #6 of 351 ranked language models as of 12 October 2026, with an Index score of 83.0 (interval 66.4–99.7); evidence: modeled · peer benchmarks. The Index combines public benchmark boards with published uncertainty; the methodology page explains the weighting.

How much does Muse Wonder cost per 1M tokens?

Muse Wonder is listed at $4.00 per 1M input tokens and $20.00 per 1M output tokens as of 12 October 2026. Prices come from the OpenRouter catalogue and re-observe on every refresh. For 1,000 requests using 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each, the listed rates imply $18.00 total (2M input + 0.5M output). This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the chosen endpoint's rate and limits before budgeting.

What is the context window of Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder has a published context window of 1M tokens (1,048,576). The snapshot lists a 943,718 token catalogue-declared route output cap. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified. The providers table lists each endpoint's context limit.

Is Muse Wonder open-weight?

No linked weights. No downloadable model weights are linked in the current source data. This does not identify every API or chat product that offers the model.

Which API providers serve Muse Wonder?

One provider serves Muse Wonder through OpenRouter as of 12 October 2026: Meta. Each provider's price, context limit, quantization and measured uptime are in the providers table above.

Which benchmarks has Muse Wonder been evaluated on?

Muse Wonder has published results on 2 public boards tracked by ModelCap as of 12 October 2026: AA Intelligence Index 52.4 (#10 of 207) and AA Humanity's Last Exam 50.1% (#24 of 657). Each board page ranks every tracked model on that benchmark. The ModelCap Index scores the results its methodology admits, with published uncertainty, and shows reference boards without scoring them.

How does Muse Wonder compare with GPT-6.1 Sol?

Muse Wonder ranks #6 (Index 83.0) and GPT-6.1 Sol ranks #7 (Index 82.7) on the ModelCap Index as of 12 October 2026. The head-to-head page lines up their benchmarks, listed prices, context windows and provider counts side by side.

When was Muse Wonder released?

Muse Wonder first appeared in the catalogue on 12 Oct 2026. It is the current version in its family. Rank and price movements since then are recorded on the site's changes feed.