Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #8); and Muse Spark 1.3 is 4.7× cheaper per output token ($4.25/1M vs $20.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #8 (98.6 vs 86.2 points).
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 1.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 57.6 against 48.1.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 61.4% against 48.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Opus 5.5 was listed 22 September 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 2 September 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • API cost matters — $4.25/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 4.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $4.00/1M.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicMuse Spark 1.3Meta
ModelCap Index position#1#8
Index score98.686.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$4.25
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens128K944K
API providers listed51
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video, File, Audio
First listed22 September 20262 September 2026
PublisherAnthropicMeta

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3 has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5Muse Spark 1.3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15371520–1553MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena4.2%3.3%–5.1%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis57.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified48.1intelligence-index:v4.3:maxClaude Opus 5.5
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis61.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)":reasoning=true48.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Muse Spark 1.3 (max)":reasoning=trueClaude Opus 5.5

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #1 against #8. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on output tokens: $4.25/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and $1.25/1M for Muse Spark 1.3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $4.63 for Muse Spark 1.3. Muse Spark 1.3 costs 74.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Muse Spark 1.3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3 open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: API only. Muse Spark 1.3: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and Muse Spark 1.3?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 1 for Muse Spark 1.3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further