Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3

Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 October 2026

As of 18 October 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#3 vs #12); and Kimi K3 is 4.2× cheaper per output token ($11.94/1M vs $50.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Fable 5.1 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #3 against #12 (85.8 vs 80.2 points).
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1502 against 1487.
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 14.0% against 1.9%.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 90.0% against 60.4%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 53.4 against 43.6.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 91.4% against 85.0%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 59.1% against 46.9%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Fable 5.1 was listed 1 September 2026, Kimi K3 16 July 2026.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • API cost matters — $11.94/1M output tokens against $50.00/1M, about 4.2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.304/1M against $10.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 20 listed API providers against 4.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1538 against 1537.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K3
FieldClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicKimi K3Moonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#3#12
Index score85.880.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$10.00$0.304
Output price / 1M tokens$50.00$11.94
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap128K944K
API providers listed420
Weight accessNo linked weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video
First listed1 September 202616 July 2026
PublisherAnthropicMoonshot AI

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3

Public benchmark boards where Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3 has a published result
BoardClaude Fable 5.1Kimi K3Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)15021496–1508Max14871482–1492MaxClaude Fable 5.1
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15371526–1549Max15381531–1545MaxKimi K3
LMArena AgentLMArena14.0%12.0%–16.0%Max1.9%1.2%–2.7%MaxClaude Fable 5.1
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation90.0%Max60.4%MaxClaude Fable 5.1
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis53.4Reasoning43.6MaxClaude Fable 5.1
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis91.4%Reasoning85.0%MaxClaude Fable 5.1
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis59.1%Reasoning46.9%MaxClaude Fable 5.1
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)57.9%54.1%–61.6%Claude Code · Max—Only one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench—54.5Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3: common questions

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Kimi K3?

Claude Fable 5.1 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 October 2026: #3 against #12. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 cheaper than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on output tokens: $11.94/1M against $50.00/1M. Input tokens are $10.00/1M for Claude Fable 5.1 and $0.304/1M for Kimi K3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $45.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 versus $6.58 for Kimi K3. Kimi K3 costs 85.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5.1 or Kimi K3?

Arena coding: Claude Fable 5.1 1537, Kimi K3 1538 — Kimi K3 leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Claude Fable 5.1 91.4%, Kimi K3 85.0% — Claude Fable 5.1 leads.

Are Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K3 open-weight models?

Claude Fable 5.1: No linked weights. Kimi K3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Claude Fable 5.1 and Kimi K3?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Claude Fable 5.1 and 20 for Kimi K3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 18 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further