Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) and Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 18 October 2026

As of 18 October 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#5 vs #12); and Gemini 3.8 Flash is 2.9× cheaper per output token ($4.13/1M vs $11.94/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #5 against #12 (83.5 vs 80.2 points).
  • API cost matters — $4.13/1M output tokens against $11.94/1M, about 2.9× cheaper.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1496 against 1487.
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 3.7% against 1.9%.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 89.2% against 60.4%.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 87.6% against 85.0%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 47.8% against 46.9%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Gemini 3.8 Flash was listed 2 September 2026, Kimi K3 16 July 2026.

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.304/1M against $0.825/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 20 listed API providers against 2.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1538 against 1528.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 43.6 against 40.9.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K3
FieldGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleKimi K3Moonshot AI
ModelCap Index position#5#12
Index score83.580.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.825$0.304
Output price / 1M tokens$4.13$11.94
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap66K944K
API providers listed220
Weight accessNo linked weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, Video
First listed2 September 202616 July 2026
PublisherGoogleMoonshot AI

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.8 Flash or Kimi K3 has a published result
BoardGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K3Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14961492–1501High14871482–1492MaxGemini 3.8 Flash
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15281521–1535High15381531–1545MaxKimi K3
LMArena AgentLMArena3.7%2.6%–4.8%High1.9%1.2%–2.7%MaxGemini 3.8 Flash
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation89.2%High60.4%MaxGemini 3.8 Flash
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation10.4%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis40.9High43.6MaxKimi K3
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis87.6%High85.0%MaxGemini 3.8 Flash
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.8%High46.9%MaxGemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)19.1%15.7%–22.5%mini-SWE-agent · High—Only one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench—54.5Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3: common questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Kimi K3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 18 October 2026: #5 against #12. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than Kimi K3?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $4.13/1M against $11.94/1M. Input tokens are $0.825/1M for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $0.304/1M for Kimi K3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.71 for Gemini 3.8 Flash versus $6.58 for Kimi K3. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 43.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Kimi K3?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Kimi K3?

Arena coding: Gemini 3.8 Flash 1528, Kimi K3 1538 — Kimi K3 leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Gemini 3.8 Flash 87.6%, Kimi K3 85.0% — Gemini 3.8 Flash leads.

Are Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K3 open-weight models?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: No linked weights. Kimi K3: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 3.8 Flash and Kimi K3?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 20 for Kimi K3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 18 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further