Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) and GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, GPT-5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#9 vs #11); GLM 5.3 Flash is 120× cheaper per output token ($0.25/1M vs $30.00/1M); GLM 5.3 Flash offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 1M tokens); and GLM 5.3 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #9 against #11 (79.8 vs 78.7 points).
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 5.3% against 2.0%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 45.8% against 39.9%.

Choose GLM 5.3 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.25/1M output tokens against $30.00/1M, about 120× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.075/1M against $5.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1.3M tokens against 1M.
  • you want to self-host: GLM 5.3 Flash ships open weights while GPT-5.5 is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 26 listed API providers against 3.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1534 against 1520.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 41.9 against 38.6.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GLM 5.3 Flash was listed 26 August 2026, GPT-5.5 24 April 2026.

GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash
FieldGPT-5.5OpenAIGLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai
ModelCap Index position#9#11
Index score79.878.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$5.00$0.075
Output price / 1M tokens$30.00$0.25
Context window1M tokens1.3M tokens
Max output tokens128K131K
API providers listed326
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText, Image, Video
First listed24 April 202626 August 2026
PublisherOpenAIZ.ai

Evidence: 7 public benchmark observations across 7 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Public benchmark boards where GPT-5.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash has a published result
BoardGPT-5.5GLM 5.3 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15201514–1526High15341517–1551GLM 5.3 Flash
LMArena AgentLMArena5.3%4.3%–6.4%X-High2.0%1.1%–2.9%GPT-5.5
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation85.0%X-High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.4%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis38.6intelligence-index:v4.3:xhigh41.9intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedGLM 5.3 Flash
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis84.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GPT-5.5 (xhigh)":reasoning=true84.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GLM-5.3-Flash":reasoning=trueTied
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis93.9%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GPT-5.5 (xhigh)":reasoning=true—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis45.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GPT-5.5 (xhigh)":reasoning=true39.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM-5.3-Flash":reasoning=trueGPT-5.5
Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminus 2Terminal-Bench78.0X-High—Only one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench58.2—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash: common questions

Is GPT-5.5 better than GLM 5.3 Flash?

GPT-5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #9 against #11. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is GPT-5.5 cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.25/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $5.00/1M for GPT-5.5 and $0.075/1M for GLM 5.3 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $25.00 for GPT-5.5 versus $0.28 for GLM 5.3 Flash. GLM 5.3 Flash costs 98.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 1M.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.5 or GLM 5.3 Flash?

Arena coding: GPT-5.5 1520, GLM 5.3 Flash 1534 — GLM 5.3 Flash leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: GPT-5.5 84.3%, GLM 5.3 Flash 84.3% — tied.

Are GPT-5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash open-weight models?

GPT-5.5: API only. GLM 5.3 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run GPT-5.5 and GLM 5.3 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for GPT-5.5 and 26 for GLM 5.3 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-5.5 vs GLM 5.3 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further