Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, GPT-5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#16 vs #19); MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 34.5× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $30.00/1M); and MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #16 against #19 (80.1 vs 79.7 points).
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1482 against 1480.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if…

  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $30.00/1M, about 34.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.435/1M against $5.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights while GPT-5.5 is no linked weights.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 3.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1538 against 1519.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Pro was listed 21 September 2026, GPT-5.5 24 April 2026.

GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-5.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
FieldGPT-5.5OpenAIMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#16#19
Index score80.179.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$5.00$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$30.00$0.87
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap128K131K
API providers listed35
Weight accessNo linked weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed24 April 202621 September 2026
PublisherOpenAIXiaomi

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Public benchmark boards where GPT-5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a published result
BoardGPT-5.5MiMo-V2.6-ProLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14821478–1485High14801470–1489Not reportedGPT-5.5
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15191513–1525High15381521–1556MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena AgentLMArena—2.7%1.8%–3.6%Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation85.0%X-High—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.4%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—29.9ReasoningOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminus 2Terminal-Bench78.0X-High—Only one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench58.2—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: common questions

Is GPT-5.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

GPT-5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #16 against #19. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is GPT-5.5 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $5.00/1M for GPT-5.5 and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $25.00 for GPT-5.5 versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 94.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Arena coding: GPT-5.5 1519, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1538 — MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads.

Are GPT-5.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro open-weight models?

GPT-5.5: No linked weights. MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-5.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for GPT-5.5 and 5 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further