Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#10 vs #16); and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 2.5× cheaper per output token ($12.00/1M vs $30.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #10 against #16 (80.9 vs 80.1 points).
  • API cost matters — $12.00/1M output tokens against $30.00/1M, about 2.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $2.00/1M against $5.00/1M.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1487 against 1482.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1521 against 1519.

Choose GPT-5.5 if…

  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 2.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-5.5 was listed 24 April 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 19 February 2026.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-5.5
FieldGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleGPT-5.5OpenAI
ModelCap Index position#10#16
Index score80.980.1
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$5.00
Output price / 1M tokens$12.00$30.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap66K128K
API providers listed23
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoFile, Image, Text
First listed19 February 202624 April 2026
PublisherGoogleOpenAI

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.5 has a published result
BoardGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGPT-5.5Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14871484–1490Not reported14821478–1485HighGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15211517–152615191513–1525HighGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
LMArena AgentLMArena-4.4%-5.9%–-3.0%—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation—85.0%X-HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation—0.4%HighOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminus 2Terminal-Bench—78.0X-HighOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench—58.2Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5: common questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than GPT-5.5?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #10 against #16. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper than GPT-5.5?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is cheaper on output tokens: $12.00/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and $5.00/1M for GPT-5.5. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $10.00 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $25.00 for GPT-5.5. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview costs 60.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.5?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.5?

Arena coding: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 1521, GPT-5.5 1519 — Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads.

Are Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-5.5 open-weight models?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: No linked weights. GPT-5.5: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and GPT-5.5?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 3 for GPT-5.5, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.5 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further