Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM 5.3 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) and GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, MiMo-V2.6-Pro holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#5 vs #13); GLM 5.3 Flash is 1.7× cheaper per output token ($0.50/1M vs $0.87/1M); GLM 5.3 Flash offers the longer context window (1.3M vs 1M tokens); and GLM 5.3 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #5 against #13 (84.8 vs 79.8 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 46.3 against 41.8.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 49.4% against 39.9%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Pro was listed 21 September 2026, GLM 5.3 Flash 26 August 2026.

Choose GLM 5.3 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.50/1M output tokens against $0.87/1M, about 1.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $0.435/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1.3M tokens against 1M.
  • you want to self-host: GLM 5.3 Flash ships open weights while MiMo-V2.6-Pro is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 30 listed API providers against 1.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM 5.3 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of MiMo-V2.6-Pro and GLM 5.3 Flash
FieldMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomiGLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai
ModelCap Index position#5#13
Index score84.879.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.435$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$0.87$0.50
Context window1M tokens1.3M tokens
Max output tokens131K944K
API providers listed130
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image, Video
First listed21 September 202626 August 2026
PublisherXiaomiZ.ai

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Public benchmark boards where MiMo-V2.6-Pro or GLM 5.3 Flash has a published result
BoardMiMo-V2.6-ProGLM 5.3 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15251513–1537Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena1.1%0.5%–1.8%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis46.3intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified41.8intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedMiMo-V2.6-Pro
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis49.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiMo-V2.6-Pro":reasoning=true39.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM 5.3 Flash":reasoning=trueMiMo-V2.6-Pro

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM 5.3 Flash: common questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than GLM 5.3 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #5 against #13. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.50/1M against $0.87/1M. Input tokens are $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and $0.15/1M for GLM 5.3 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.30 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro versus $0.55 for GLM 5.3 Flash. GLM 5.3 Flash costs 57.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window: 1.3M tokens against 1M.

Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or GLM 5.3 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are MiMo-V2.6-Pro and GLM 5.3 Flash open-weight models?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: API only. GLM 5.3 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run MiMo-V2.6-Pro and GLM 5.3 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and 30 for GLM 5.3 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM 5.3 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further