Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Kimi K3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#11 vs #19); MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 18.4× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $16.00/1M); and MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #11 against #19 (80.8 vs 79.7 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.192/1M against $0.435/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 21 listed API providers against 5.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1488 against 1480.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1540 against 1538.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if…

  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $16.00/1M, about 18.4× cheaper.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights while Kimi K3 is restricted license.
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 2.7% against 0.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Pro was listed 21 September 2026, Kimi K3 16 July 2026.

Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Kimi K3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
FieldKimi K3Moonshot AIMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#11#19
Index score80.879.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.192$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$16.00$0.87
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap944K131K
API providers listed215
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed16 July 202621 September 2026
PublisherMoonshot AIXiaomi

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Public benchmark boards where Kimi K3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a published result
BoardKimi K3MiMo-V2.6-ProLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14881484–1493Max14801470–1489Not reportedKimi K3
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15401533–1547Max15381521–1556Kimi K3
LMArena AgentLMArena0.8%0.3%–1.4%Max2.7%1.8%–3.6%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation60.4%Max—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—29.9ReasoningOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench54.5—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: common questions

Is Kimi K3 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Kimi K3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #11 against #19. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $16.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.192/1M for Kimi K3 and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $8.38 for Kimi K3 versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 84.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Arena coding: Kimi K3 1540, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1538 — Kimi K3 leads.

Are Kimi K3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro open-weight models?

Kimi K3: Restricted license. MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Kimi K3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 21 API providers for Kimi K3 and 5 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Kimi K3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further