Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.5

Kimi K3 (Moonshot AI) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 7 November 2026

As of 7 November 2026, Kimi K3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#11 vs #17); and Kimi K3 is 1.9× cheaper per output token ($16.00/1M vs $30.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #11 against #17 (80.8 vs 80.1 points).
  • API cost matters — $16.00/1M output tokens against $30.00/1M, about 1.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.192/1M against $5.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 21 listed API providers against 3.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1488 against 1481.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1538 against 1519.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Kimi K3 was listed 16 July 2026, GPT-5.5 24 April 2026.

Choose GPT-5.5 if…

  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 85.0% against 60.4%.
  • WildClawBench OpenClaw is your yardstick — 58.2 against 54.5.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.5: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Kimi K3 and GPT-5.5
FieldKimi K3Moonshot AIGPT-5.5OpenAI
ModelCap Index position#11#17
Index score80.880.1
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.192$5.00
Output price / 1M tokens$16.00$30.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap944K128K
API providers listed213
Weight accessRestricted licenseNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoFile, Image, Text
First listed16 July 202624 April 2026
PublisherMoonshot AIOpenAI

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.5

Public benchmark boards where Kimi K3 or GPT-5.5 has a published result
BoardKimi K3GPT-5.5Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14881484–1492Max14811478–1485HighKimi K3
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15381532–1545Max15191513–1524HighKimi K3
LMArena AgentLMArena0.8%0.3%–1.4%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation60.4%Max85.0%X-HighGPT-5.5
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation—0.4%HighOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench54.558.2GPT-5.5
Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminus 2Terminal-Bench—78.0X-HighOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.5: common questions

Is Kimi K3 better than GPT-5.5?

Kimi K3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 7 November 2026: #11 against #17. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Kimi K3 cheaper than GPT-5.5?

Kimi K3 is cheaper on output tokens: $16.00/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.192/1M for Kimi K3 and $5.00/1M for GPT-5.5. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $8.38 for Kimi K3 versus $25.00 for GPT-5.5. Kimi K3 costs 66.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K3 or GPT-5.5?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Kimi K3 or GPT-5.5?

Arena coding: Kimi K3 1538, GPT-5.5 1519 — Kimi K3 leads.

Are Kimi K3 and GPT-5.5 open-weight models?

Kimi K3: Restricted license. GPT-5.5: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Kimi K3 and GPT-5.5?

ModelCap currently lists 21 API providers for Kimi K3 and 3 for GPT-5.5, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.5 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 7 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further