Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) and GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, GLM 5.3 Flash holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#11 vs #14); GLM 5.3 Flash is 10× cheaper per output token ($0.25/1M vs $2.50/1M); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1.3M tokens); and GLM 5.3 Flash ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent if…

  • you need the longer context window — 2M tokens against 1.3M.

Choose GLM 5.3 Flash if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #11 against #14 (78.7 vs 77.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.25/1M output tokens against $2.50/1M, about 10× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.075/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • you want to self-host: GLM 5.3 Flash ships open weights while Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 26 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1534 against 1508.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GLM 5.3 Flash was listed 26 August 2026, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 31 March 2026.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs GLM 5.3 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and GLM 5.3 Flash
FieldGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAIGLM 5.3 FlashZ.ai
ModelCap Index position#14#11
Index score77.578.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.25$0.075
Output price / 1M tokens$2.50$0.25
Context window2M tokens1.3M tokens
Max output tokens1.8M131K
API providers listed126
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video
First listed31 March 202626 August 2026
PublisherxAIZ.ai

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Public benchmark boards where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or GLM 5.3 Flash has a published result
BoardGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentGLM 5.3 FlashLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15081502–1514Beta · 030915341517–1551GLM 5.3 Flash
LMArena AgentLMArena2.0%1.1%–2.9%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis41.9intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis84.3%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GLM-5.3-Flash":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis39.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GLM-5.3-Flash":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs GLM 5.3 Flash: common questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #11 against #14. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash?

GLM 5.3 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.25/1M against $2.50/1M. Input tokens are $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and $0.075/1M for GLM 5.3 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent versus $0.28 for GLM 5.3 Flash. GLM 5.3 Flash costs 92.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or GLM 5.3 Flash?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1.3M.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or GLM 5.3 Flash?

Arena coding: Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1508, GLM 5.3 Flash 1534 — GLM 5.3 Flash leads.

Are Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and GLM 5.3 Flash open-weight models?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: API only. GLM 5.3 Flash: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and GLM 5.3 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 26 for GLM 5.3 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs GLM 5.3 Flash comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further