Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 3 October 2026
As of 3 October 2026, Claude Sonnet 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#6 vs #14); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 4× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $10.00/1M); and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1M tokens).
Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Public benchmark boards where Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a published result
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: common questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 3 October 2026: #6 against #14. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $10.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $9.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 versus $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 58.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1M. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.
Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Arena coding: Claude Sonnet 5.5 1536, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1509 — Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads.
Are Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent open-weight models?
Claude Sonnet 5.5: No linked weights. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.
Where can I run Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 1 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comparison?
Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 3 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.