Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Live dataset updated 10/11/2026, 3:39:45 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#42#154
Index score68.841.7
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimated4 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (51%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (50%); shrunk 9.8 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.55Unavailable
Output / 1M$3.50Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshempty
Context262K131K
Providers100
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B is #42; Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is #154 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 68.8 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 41.7 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is Measured; Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is Estimated.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 131,072 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.
  • ModelCap currently lists 10 providers for Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 0 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.