Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash
Live dataset updated 10/23/2026, 8:09:43 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | MiniMax M3.1 Flash MiniMax | GLM 5.3 Flash Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #22 | #23 |
| Index score | 77.4 | 77.3 |
| Evidence | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (6%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 6 rows (94%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.9 toward the measured corpus | Measured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.15 | $0.0052 |
| Output / 1M | $0.60 | $0.199 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Providers | 5 | 32 |
| Weight access | Restricted license | Open weights |
Decision facts
- MiniMax M3.1 Flash is #22; GLM 5.3 Flash is #23 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 77.4 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and 77.3 for GLM 5.3 Flash. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is Estimated; GLM 5.3 Flash is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.60 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and $0.20 for GLM 5.3 Flash. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash versus $0.11 for GLM 5.3 Flash. GLM 5.3 Flash costs 81.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and 1,048,576 for GLM 5.3 Flash.
- Weight access differs: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is restricted; GLM 5.3 Flash is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and 32 for GLM 5.3 Flash.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#6 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3#2 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.