Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with K2 Horizon 32B and Intern S2 Preview 397B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

K2 Horizon 32B vs Intern S2 Preview 397B

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 8:34:26 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of K2 Horizon 32B and Intern S2 Preview 397B
Field
ModelCap position#92#88
Index score48.249.2
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 193 held-out anchors (51%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 8 rows (49%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 8 rows; optimism haircut 1.3 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 4.1 up toward the measured corpusMeasuredglobal-corpus-prior over 193 held-out anchors (65%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.3% support (35%); shrunk 5.7 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • K2 Horizon 32B is #92; Intern S2 Preview 397B is #88 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 48.2 for K2 Horizon 32B and 49.2 for Intern S2 Preview 397B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: K2 Horizon 32B is Estimated; Intern S2 Preview 397B is Measured.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.