Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#4 vs #5); and Muse Spark 1.3 is 1.4× cheaper per output token ($4.25/1M vs $6.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #4 against #5 (83.8 vs 83.2 points).
  • API cost matters — $4.25/1M output tokens against $6.00/1M, about 1.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 48.2 against 45.4.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 48.7% against 43.1%.

Choose Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.8 Max (0902) was listed 3 September 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 2 September 2026.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FieldMuse Spark 1.3MetaQwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
ModelCap Index position#4#5
Index score83.883.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.25$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$4.25$6.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens944K131K
API providers listed11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, Video
First listed2 September 20263 September 2026
PublisherMetaQwen

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Public benchmark boards where Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a published result
BoardMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15371520–1553MaxOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena4.1%3.1%–5.2%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis48.2intelligence-index:v4.3:max45.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedMuse Spark 1.3
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis48.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Muse Spark 1.3 (max)":reasoning=true43.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.8 Max (0902)":reasoning=trueMuse Spark 1.3

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): common questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #4 against #5. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper on output tokens: $4.25/1M against $6.00/1M. Input tokens are $1.25/1M for Muse Spark 1.3 and $2.00/1M for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.63 for Muse Spark 1.3 versus $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Muse Spark 1.3 costs 33.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) open-weight models?

Muse Spark 1.3: API only. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Muse Spark 1.3 and 1 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902), from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further