Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#5 vs #6); and Gemini 3.8 Flash is 1.6× cheaper per output token ($3.75/1M vs $6.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $3.75/1M output tokens against $6.00/1M, about 1.6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.75/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 47.8% against 43.1%.

Choose Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #5 against #6 (83.2 vs 82.8 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 45.4 against 41.2.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.8 Max (0902) was listed 3 September 2026, Gemini 3.8 Flash 2 September 2026.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
FieldGemini 3.8 FlashGoogleQwen3.8 Max (0902)Qwen
ModelCap Index position#6#5
Index score82.883.2
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.75$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$3.75$6.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens66K131K
API providers listed21
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, Video
First listed2 September 20263 September 2026
PublisherGoogleQwen

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has a published result
BoardGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15351519–1551HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis41.2intelligence-index:v4.3:high45.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedQwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)":reasoning=true43.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.8 Max (0902)":reasoning=trueGemini 3.8 Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)19.1%15.7%–22.5%mini-SWE-agent · HighOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): common questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash better than Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #5 against #6. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $3.75/1M against $6.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.75/1M for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $2.00/1M for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.38 for Gemini 3.8 Flash versus $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Gemini 3.8 Flash costs 51.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) open-weight models?

Gemini 3.8 Flash: API only. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 1 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902), from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further