Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Live dataset updated 10/23/2026, 1:29:37 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Field
ModelCap position#30#22
Index score74.677.7
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 210 held-out anchors (6%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 6 rows (94%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.8 toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$1.32Unavailable
Output / 1M$3.96Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context1M—
Providers210
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is #30; MiniMax M3.1 Flash is #22 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 74.6 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 77.7 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is Measured; MiniMax M3.1 Flash is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open; MiniMax M3.1 Flash is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 21 providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 0 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.