Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 9:19:37 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic | Ling 3.0 Flash VL InclusionAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #62 | #59 |
| Index score | 56.0 | 57.6 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board |
| Input / 1M | $1.00 | $0.06 |
| Output / 1M | $5.00 | $0.18 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 200K | 131K |
| Providers | 4 | 1 |
| Weight access | API only | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Claude Haiku 4.5 is #62; Ling 3.0 Flash VL is #59 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 56.0 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 57.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $5.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and $0.18 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.50 for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus $0.21 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL. Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs 95.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 200,000 tokens for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 131,072 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.
- Weight access differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is none; Ling 3.0 Flash VL is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 1 for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.