Skip to content
ModelCap

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Official publisher releaseOpen weights

InclusionAI·#55 of 350 on the current board·cheaper than #54 Kimi K2.7 Code

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is a language model from InclusionAI. It ranks #55 of 350 on ModelCap's current board, with an Index score of 64.6, modeled from the publisher's launch results against measured models. Its score range of 46.0–83.1 spans positions #6–#132. It is listed at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens from one provider. It reads up to 131K tokens of context, and its weights are openly downloadable.

Figures as of 24 Oct 2026, 19:14 UTC · download the public dataset · methodology

ModelCap Index · Current board
64.6#55
Modeled from the publisher's launch results against measured models · range 46.0–83.1
Market Gravity
16.3Decreased by 0.2
Secondary market signal
Input
$0.06
per 1M tokens
Output
$0.18
per 1M tokens
Context
131K
tokens
Providers
1
endpoint

Providers

Uptime measured over the last 30 minutes
ProviderInputOutputContextQuantUptime
DeepInfrafp16$0.06$0.18131Kfp16100.0%

Hugging Face Inference Providers

Exact repository identity

Provider economics and telemetry published by the Hugging Face Router. These are operational signals, not benchmark results.

ProviderInputOutputContextTTFTThroughputFeatures
deepinfra
live
$0.06$0.18131K3385 ms28.3 tok/stools · structured
novita
live
$0.075$0.22262K832 ms248.3 tok/stools

ModelCap Index · Current board

Methodology
64.6
Modeled from the publisher's launch results against measured models
Current board
#55 of 350
Score range
46.0–83.1
Rank range
#6–#132
Technical details
Public rank basis
Modeled · peer benchmarks (architecture)
Evidence label
Modeled · peer benchmarks · 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (61%); global-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (39%); shrunk 7.8 toward the measured corpus
Index support
10.9% · weak
Identity binding
Exact catalogue product · inclusionai/inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vl · aggregates disclosed benchmark configurations · endpoint configuration not claimed · artifact metadata inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-flash-VL@c22bf252f15b66d18ca00a15989ac7ed46b7f09e (not the evaluation revision)
Index observations used
0
Qualified Index evidence point
64.6
How this position was produced · fused launch placement

No general-family board lists this model yet. Its point estimate is the precision-weighted mean of every channel that spoke for it; each channel’s share is the weight it carried. Independent measurements replace this placement as boards list the model.

Fused estimate
64.6 ± 14.5
Independent share
0%
Shrink toward corpus
-7.8
Optimism haircut
None applied
Method
precision-weighted-v1
Channels fused into this model’s launch placement
ChannelEstimateShare
Corpus ladder · not independent
1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders
72.3 ± 18.661%
Publisher corpus prior · not independent
global-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors
52.3 ± 23.339%
Bayesian Evidence Score · measured evidence input only

BES normalizes admitted public benchmark evidence for measured Index rows. Its legacy score and observables prior do not define the public language rank.

Observed capability
—
Evidence status
No admitted measured evidence
General preference
—
Coding
—
Agents & tools
—
Reasoning
—
Evidence breadth
0%
Evidence coverage
0%
Market and catalogue signals · secondary, never the language Index rank
Usage (OpenRouter popularity)
7.4
Liquidity (providers × uptime)
22.1
Open reach (HF downloads)
16.4
Surface (context / tools / modalities)
85.2
Freshness
84.5
  • · OpenRouter popularity #222
  • · 1 live provider
  • · HF 30d downloads 12567
  • · Catalogue: context 131072, reasoning, tools, modalities Text/Image/Video
  • · First seen 2026-09-10

These adoption and deployment observations remain context only. They do not change this model's ModelCap Index score or rank.

The bounded 0–100 capability score blends each source’s competitive placement with its published achievement, then combines capability families. Evidence breadth adds a modest uncertainty adjustment; price and popularity are not part of benchmark-led rank.

Experimental capability estimate

Estimate policy
51.9
38.6–65.3 uncertainty interval
Excluded from rank
Confidence
80%
Training support
221 models · 129 lineages
Out-of-domain check
in domain
Feature coverage
100%
Lineage-held-out error
8.3 MAE

Experimental estimate. This layer predicts from admitted evidence and safe metadata only. It never enters ModelCap Score or rank.

Deployment readiness

Metadata index
72.5
partial · 76% metadata coverage
Not capability
Artifact reproducibility
85.0
Access & legal clarity
100.0
Deployability
90.0
Evaluation provenance
0.0

Not yet published: the base model it derives from, admitted benchmark results, results across several capability areas, results from more than one source, a confident match to its benchmark entries, pinned evaluation dataset versions.

A metadata completeness and deployability index—not a safety certification, quality grade, or production-readiness claim.

Market activity

Venue coverage
Market Gravity
16.3
OpenRouter weekly popularity
#222 of 342

Market Gravity uses OpenRouter’s full-catalogue popularity order. Sparse Vercel top-ten observations appear only when published and do not affect the score.

Arena preference

No matched Arena rating

This model is visible because it is available in the live catalogue, but it has no trustworthy community result yet. ModelCap does not infer a quality score from price, features, or market activity.

Market Gravity breakdown

Usage55%
7.4

OpenRouter weekly popularity across the full model catalogue.

Liquidity25%
22.1

Independent providers versus the model's open or closed cohort, weighted by uptime.

Open reach15%
16.4

Hugging Face 30-day downloads for open models; neutral for closed models.

Freshness5%
84.5

Time since first public availability, on a six-month half-life.

Specification

Model ID
inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vl
Context window
131K tokens
Declared output cap
33K tokens

OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified. OpenRouter metadata

Inputs
Text, Image, Video
Outputs
Text
Tokenizer
Other
Cached input tokens
$0.012 / 1M
First seen on OpenRouter
10 Sept 2026

Capabilities

  • Supported: Reasoning
  • Supported: Tool use
  • Supported: Structured output
  • Supported: Response format
  • Not supported: Moderated

Weights & access

Open weights. Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI.

Access
Open weights
Licence
mit
Pinned revision
c22bf252f15b
Parameters
124.8B
Architecture
BailingMoeV3VLForConditionalGeneration
Model type
bailing_moe_v3_vl
Hugging Face downloads (30d)
13K
Downloads (all time)
24K
Likes
125
Repository updated
24 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC

Compare Ling 3.0 Flash VL with

Pick any model

Benchmark leaderboards featuring Ling 3.0 Flash VL

All leaderboards
Public benchmark boards on which Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a published result
LeaderboardScoreSource rankConfigurationPublished
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis24.6#86 of 132Reasoning7 Oct 2026
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis64.4%#39 of 124Reasoning1 Oct 2026
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Artificial Analysis22.0%#97 of 265Reasoning12 Sept 2026

Alternatives to Ling 3.0 Flash VL, by the numbers

Ranked neighbours

Models within 3 places of #55 on the ModelCap Index.

Cheaper at a similar or higher Index

Index score within 3 points of, or above, this model's, with a lower listed blended price (3:1 input:output).

Other ranked InclusionAI models

The same publisher's other current models with a public Index position.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: common questions

How does Ling 3.0 Flash VL rank among AI models?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL holds ModelCap Index position #55 of 350 ranked language models as of 24 October 2026, with an Index score of 64.6 (interval 46.0–83.1); evidence: modeled · peer benchmarks. The Index combines public benchmark boards with published uncertainty; the methodology page explains the weighting.

How much does Ling 3.0 Flash VL cost per 1M tokens?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is listed at $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.18 per 1M output tokens as of 24 October 2026. Prices come from the OpenRouter catalogue and re-observe on every refresh. For 1,000 requests using 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each, the listed rates imply $0.21 total (2M input + 0.5M output). This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the chosen endpoint's rate and limits before budgeting.

What is the context window of Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a published context window of 131K tokens (131,072). The snapshot lists a 32,768 token catalogue-declared route output cap. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified. The providers table lists each endpoint's context limit.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash VL open-weight?

Open weights (mit). Downloadable weights are published under an OSI or free-culture license in the current repository metadata. This describes weight availability, not whether the full training stack qualifies as Open Source AI. The repository is inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-flash-VL on Hugging Face.

Which API providers serve Ling 3.0 Flash VL?

One provider serves Ling 3.0 Flash VL through OpenRouter as of 24 October 2026: DeepInfra. Each provider's price, context limit, quantization and measured uptime are in the providers table above.

Which benchmarks has Ling 3.0 Flash VL been evaluated on?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL has published results on 3 public boards tracked by ModelCap as of 24 October 2026: AA Intelligence Index 24.6 (#86 of 132), AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 64.4% (#39 of 124) and AA Humanity's Last Exam 22.0% (#97 of 265). Each board page ranks every tracked model on that benchmark. The ModelCap Index scores the results its methodology admits, with published uncertainty, and shows reference boards without scoring them.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash VL compare with Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL ranks #55 (Index 64.6) and Ling 3.1 Flash ranks #38 (Index 70.9) on the ModelCap Index as of 24 October 2026. The head-to-head page lines up their benchmarks, listed prices, context windows and provider counts side by side.

When was Ling 3.0 Flash VL released?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL first appeared in the catalogue on 10 Sept 2026. It is the current version in its family. Rank and price movements since then are recorded on the site's changes feed.