Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.4 Nano vs o4 Mini

GPT-5.4 Nano (OpenAI) and o4 Mini (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, GPT-5.4 Nano holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#112 vs #136); GPT-5.4 Nano is 1.8× cheaper per output token ($1.25/1M vs $2.20/1M); and GPT-5.4 Nano offers the longer context window (400K vs 200K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5.4 Nano if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #112 against #136 (52.8 vs 49.0 points).
  • API cost matters — $1.25/1M output tokens against $2.20/1M, about 1.8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.20/1M against $0.55/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 400K tokens against 200K.
  • you want provider choice — 2 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1401 against 1391.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1460 against 1433.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-5.4 Nano was listed 17 March 2026, o4 Mini 16 April 2025.

Choose o4 Mini if…

  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 6.1% against 5.7%.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs o4 Mini: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-5.4 Nano and o4 Mini
FieldGPT-5.4 NanoOpenAIo4 MiniOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#112#136
Index score52.849.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.20$0.55
Output price / 1M tokens$1.25$2.20
Context window400K tokens200K tokens
Declared route output cap128K100K
API providers listed21
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextImage, Text, File
First listed17 March 202616 April 2025
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-5.4 Nano vs o4 Mini

Public benchmark boards where GPT-5.4 Nano or o4 Mini has a published result
BoardGPT-5.4 Nanoo4 MiniLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14011397–1405High13911387–1395Not reportedGPT-5.4 Nano
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14601454–1466High14331426–1440GPT-5.4 Nano
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation5.7%X-High6.1%Higho4 Mini
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)—45.0%Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)—53.2Function callingOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs o4 Mini: common questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than o4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 Nano ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #112 against #136. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is GPT-5.4 Nano cheaper than o4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 Nano is cheaper on output tokens: $1.25/1M against $2.20/1M. Input tokens are $0.20/1M for GPT-5.4 Nano and $0.55/1M for o4 Mini. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.02 for GPT-5.4 Nano versus $2.20 for o4 Mini. GPT-5.4 Nano costs 53.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or o4 Mini?

GPT-5.4 Nano has the larger context window: 400K tokens against 200K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.4 Nano or o4 Mini?

Arena coding: GPT-5.4 Nano 1460, o4 Mini 1433 — GPT-5.4 Nano leads.

Are GPT-5.4 Nano and o4 Mini open-weight models?

GPT-5.4 Nano: No linked weights. o4 Mini: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-5.4 Nano and o4 Mini?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for GPT-5.4 Nano and 1 for o4 Mini, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-5.4 Nano vs o4 Mini comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further