Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-5.4 Nano (OpenAI) and GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, GPT-6 Luna holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#53 vs #112); GPT-6 Luna is 2.5× cheaper per output token ($0.50/1M vs $1.25/1M); and GPT-6 Luna offers the longer context window (1M vs 400K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5.4 Nano if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which GPT-5.4 Nano leads GPT-6 Luna for this pair.

Choose GPT-6 Luna if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #53 against #112 (67.6 vs 52.8 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.50/1M output tokens against $1.25/1M, about 2.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.10/1M against $0.20/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 400K.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 2.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1441 against 1401.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1506 against 1460.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 59.3% against 5.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-6 Luna was listed 22 September 2026, GPT-5.4 Nano 17 March 2026.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-6 Luna
FieldGPT-5.4 NanoOpenAIGPT-6 LunaOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#112#53
Index score52.867.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.20$0.10
Output price / 1M tokens$1.25$0.50
Context window400K tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap128K128K
API providers listed23
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextFile, Image, Text
First listed17 March 202622 September 2026
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna

Public benchmark boards where GPT-5.4 Nano or GPT-6 Luna has a published result
BoardGPT-5.4 NanoGPT-6 LunaLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14011397–1405High14411437–1445MaxGPT-6 Luna
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14601454–1466High15061500–1512MaxGPT-6 Luna
LMArena AgentLMArena—1.9%1.5%–2.3%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation5.7%X-High59.3%MaxGPT-6 Luna
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation—0.2%MediumOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—27.9MaxOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)—16.4%13.6%–19.1%Codex · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna: common questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #53 against #112. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is GPT-5.4 Nano cheaper than GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on output tokens: $0.50/1M against $1.25/1M. Input tokens are $0.20/1M for GPT-5.4 Nano and $0.10/1M for GPT-6 Luna. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.02 for GPT-5.4 Nano versus $0.45 for GPT-6 Luna. GPT-6 Luna costs 56.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 400K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.4 Nano or GPT-6 Luna?

Arena coding: GPT-5.4 Nano 1460, GPT-6 Luna 1506 — GPT-6 Luna leads.

Are GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-6 Luna open-weight models?

GPT-5.4 Nano: No linked weights. GPT-6 Luna: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-5.4 Nano and GPT-6 Luna?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for GPT-5.4 Nano and 3 for GPT-6 Luna, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-5.4 Nano vs GPT-6 Luna comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further