Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs o3

GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) and o3 (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, GPT-6 Luna holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#53 vs #74); GPT-6 Luna is 16× cheaper per output token ($0.50/1M vs $8.00/1M); and GPT-6 Luna offers the longer context window (1M vs 200K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-6 Luna if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #53 against #74 (67.6 vs 62.0 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.50/1M output tokens against $8.00/1M, about 16× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.10/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 200K.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1441 against 1432.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1506 against 1460.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 59.3% against 6.5%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-6 Luna was listed 22 September 2026, o3 16 April 2025.

Choose o3 if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which o3 leads GPT-6 Luna for this pair.

GPT-6 Luna vs o3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-6 Luna and o3
FieldGPT-6 LunaOpenAIo3OpenAI
ModelCap Index position#53#74
Index score67.662.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.10$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$0.50$8.00
Context window1M tokens200K tokens
Declared route output cap128K100K
API providers listed31
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextImage, Text, File
First listed22 September 202616 April 2025
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-6 Luna vs o3

Public benchmark boards where GPT-6 Luna or o3 has a published result
BoardGPT-6 Lunao3Leads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14411437–1445Max14321428–1435Not reportedGPT-6 Luna
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15061500–1512Max14601454–1466GPT-6 Luna
LMArena AgentLMArena1.9%1.5%–2.3%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation59.3%Max6.5%HighGPT-6 Luna
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.2%Medium—Only one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)—58.4%Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)—63.1PromptOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis27.9Max—Only one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)16.4%13.6%–19.1%Codex · Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-6 Luna vs o3: common questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than o3?

GPT-6 Luna ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #53 against #74. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is GPT-6 Luna cheaper than o3?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper on output tokens: $0.50/1M against $8.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.10/1M for GPT-6 Luna and $2.00/1M for o3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.45 for GPT-6 Luna versus $8.00 for o3. GPT-6 Luna costs 94.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or o3?

GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 200K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-6 Luna or o3?

Arena coding: GPT-6 Luna 1506, o3 1460 — GPT-6 Luna leads.

Are GPT-6 Luna and o3 open-weight models?

GPT-6 Luna: No linked weights. o3: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-6 Luna and o3?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for GPT-6 Luna and 1 for o3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-6 Luna vs o3 comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further