Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.4 Nano vs gpt-oss-20b

GPT-5.4 Nano (OpenAI) and gpt-oss-20b (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, GPT-5.4 Nano holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#112 vs #228); gpt-oss-20b is 9.6× cheaper per output token ($0.13/1M vs $1.25/1M); GPT-5.4 Nano offers the longer context window (400K vs 131K tokens); and gpt-oss-20b ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5.4 Nano if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #112 against #228 (52.8 vs 31.6 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 400K tokens against 131K.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1401 against 1317.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1460 against 1368.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-5.4 Nano was listed 17 March 2026, gpt-oss-20b 5 August 2025.

Choose gpt-oss-20b if…

  • API cost matters — $0.13/1M output tokens against $1.25/1M, about 9.6× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.03/1M against $0.20/1M.
  • you want to self-host: gpt-oss-20b ships open weights while GPT-5.4 Nano is no linked weights.
  • you want provider choice — 10 listed API providers against 2.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs gpt-oss-20b: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-5.4 Nano and gpt-oss-20b
FieldGPT-5.4 NanoOpenAIgpt-oss-20bOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#112#228
Index score52.831.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.20$0.03
Output price / 1M tokens$1.25$0.13
Context window400K tokens131K tokens
Declared route output cap128K118K
API providers listed210
Weight accessNo linked weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText
First listed17 March 20265 August 2025
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-5.4 Nano vs gpt-oss-20b

Public benchmark boards where GPT-5.4 Nano or gpt-oss-20b has a published result
BoardGPT-5.4 Nanogpt-oss-20bLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14011397–1405High13171311–1324Not reportedGPT-5.4 Nano
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14601454–1466High13681355–1381GPT-5.4 Nano
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation5.7%X-High—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs gpt-oss-20b: common questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than gpt-oss-20b?

GPT-5.4 Nano ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #112 against #228. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is GPT-5.4 Nano cheaper than gpt-oss-20b?

gpt-oss-20b is cheaper on output tokens: $0.13/1M against $1.25/1M. Input tokens are $0.20/1M for GPT-5.4 Nano and $0.03/1M for gpt-oss-20b. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.02 for GPT-5.4 Nano versus $0.13 for gpt-oss-20b. gpt-oss-20b costs 87.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or gpt-oss-20b?

GPT-5.4 Nano has the larger context window: 400K tokens against 131K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.4 Nano or gpt-oss-20b?

Arena coding: GPT-5.4 Nano 1460, gpt-oss-20b 1368 — GPT-5.4 Nano leads.

Are GPT-5.4 Nano and gpt-oss-20b open-weight models?

GPT-5.4 Nano: No linked weights. gpt-oss-20b: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-5.4 Nano and gpt-oss-20b?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for GPT-5.4 Nano and 10 for gpt-oss-20b, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-5.4 Nano vs gpt-oss-20b comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further