Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Muse Wonder (Meta) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 14 October 2026

As of 14 October 2026, Muse Wonder holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#2 vs #21); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 8× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $20.00/1M); and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Muse Wonder if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #2 against #21 (87.0 vs 77.3 points).
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1513 against 1470.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1558 against 1508.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Muse Wonder was listed 12 October 2026, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 31 March 2026.

Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $4.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 2M tokens against 1M.

Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Muse Wonder and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
FieldMuse WonderMetaGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI
ModelCap Index position#2#21
Index score87.077.3
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$2.50
Context window1M tokens2M tokens
Declared route output cap944K1.8M
API providers listed11
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, File, AudioText, Image, File
First listed12 October 202631 March 2026
PublisherMetaxAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Public benchmark boards where Muse Wonder or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a published result
BoardMuse WonderGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)15131499–1526Max14701467–1474Beta · 0309Muse Wonder
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15581532–1584Max15081503–1514Beta · 0309Muse Wonder
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis52.4Max—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis50.1%Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: common questions

Is Muse Wonder better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Muse Wonder ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 14 October 2026: #2 against #21. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Muse Wonder cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Muse Wonder and $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Muse Wonder versus $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 79.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Wonder or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1M. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Muse Wonder or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Arena coding: Muse Wonder 1558, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1508 — Muse Wonder leads.

Are Muse Wonder and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent open-weight models?

Muse Wonder: No linked weights. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Muse Wonder and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Muse Wonder and 1 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 14 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further