Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #13); and Claude Opus 5.5 is 1.5× cheaper per output token ($20.00/1M vs $30.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #13 (98.6 vs 82.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $20.00/1M output tokens against $30.00/1M, about 1.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $4.00/1M against $5.00/1M.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 3.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 93.3% against 85.0%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 57.6 against 38.4.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 61.4% against 45.8%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Opus 5.5 was listed 22 September 2026, GPT-5.5 24 April 2026.

Choose GPT-5.5 if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which GPT-5.5 leads Claude Opus 5.5 for this pair.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.5
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicGPT-5.5OpenAI
ModelCap Index position#1#13
Index score98.682.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$5.00
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$30.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens128K128K
API providers listed53
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileFile, Image, Text
First listed22 September 202624 April 2026
PublisherAnthropicOpenAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 7 public benchmark observations across 7 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.5 has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5GPT-5.5Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15201514–1526HighOnly one result
LMArena AgentLMArena5.0%4.1%–6.0%X-HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%High85.0%X-HighClaude Opus 5.5
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.4%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis57.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified38.4intelligence-index:v4.3:xhighClaude Opus 5.5
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis93.9%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GPT-5.5 (xhigh)":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis61.4%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)":reasoning=true45.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GPT-5.5 (xhigh)":reasoning=trueClaude Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench 2.1 Terminus 2Terminal-Bench78.0X-HighOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench58.2Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than GPT-5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #1 against #13. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than GPT-5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $20.00/1M against $30.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and $5.00/1M for GPT-5.5. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $25.00 for GPT-5.5. Claude Opus 5.5 costs 28.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.5?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.5?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.5 open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: API only. GPT-5.5: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.5?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 3 for GPT-5.5, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further