Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and Qwen3 Coder Next, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Live dataset updated 10/1/2026, 9:09:05 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen | |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #115 | #110 |
| Index score | 51.9 | 53.3 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board |
| Input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.12 |
| Output / 1M | $1.00 | $0.80 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Providers | 5 | 4 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is #115; Qwen3 Coder Next is #110 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 51.9 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 53.3 for Qwen3 Coder Next. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.00 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.10 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B versus $0.64 for Qwen3 Coder Next. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 41.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 262,144 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B and 4 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#5 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.