Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) and MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#5 vs #19); MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 4.9× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $4.25/1M); and MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Muse Spark 1.3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #5 against #19 (83.7 vs 79.7 points).
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1495 against 1480.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro if…

  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $4.25/1M, about 4.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.435/1M against $1.25/1M.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.6-Pro ships open weights while Muse Spark 1.3 is no linked weights.
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1538 against 1534.
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 2.7% against 2.5%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiMo-V2.6-Pro was listed 21 September 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 2 September 2026.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Muse Spark 1.3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro
FieldMuse Spark 1.3MetaMiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#5#19
Index score83.779.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.25$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$4.25$0.87
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap944K131K
API providers listed15
Weight accessNo linked weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, FileText, Image, Video, Audio
First listed2 September 202621 September 2026
PublisherMetaXiaomi

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Public benchmark boards where Muse Spark 1.3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro has a published result
BoardMuse Spark 1.3MiMo-V2.6-ProLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14951490–1500Max14801470–1489Not reportedMuse Spark 1.3
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15341525–1543Max15381521–1556MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena AgentLMArena2.5%1.7%–3.3%Max2.7%1.8%–3.6%MiMo-V2.6-Pro
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—29.9ReasoningOnly one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)14.6%11.6%–17.5%Muse Code · X-High—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro: common questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Muse Spark 1.3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #5 against #19. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $4.25/1M. Input tokens are $1.25/1M for Muse Spark 1.3 and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.63 for Muse Spark 1.3 versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 71.8% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Muse Spark 1.3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Arena coding: Muse Spark 1.3 1534, MiMo-V2.6-Pro 1538 — MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads.

Are Muse Spark 1.3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro open-weight models?

Muse Spark 1.3: No linked weights. MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Muse Spark 1.3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Muse Spark 1.3 and 5 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further