Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Live dataset updated 11/7/2026, 12:54:46 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 235B A22B
Field
ModelCap position#278#110
Index score22.453.4
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.66Unavailable
Output / 1M$1.00Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshempty
Context33K131K
Providers10
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is #278; Qwen3 235B A22B is #110 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.4 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and 53.4 for Qwen3 235B A22B. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 32,768 tokens for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and 131,072 for Qwen3 235B A22B.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and 0 for Qwen3 235B A22B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.