Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Google) and Gemini 4 Argon (Google) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 13 October 2026

As of 13 October 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#8 vs #33); and Gemini 4 Argon is 1.2× cheaper per output token ($10.00/1M vs $12.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #8 against #33 (82.2 vs 73.0 points).

Choose Gemini 4 Argon if…

  • API cost matters — $10.00/1M output tokens against $12.00/1M, about 1.2× cheaper.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 52.6 against 29.7.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 57.1% against 47.0%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Gemini 4 Argon was listed 13 October 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 19 February 2026.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon
FieldGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleGemini 4 ArgonGoogle
ModelCap Index position#8#33
Index score82.273.0
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$12.00$10.00
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap66K66K
API providers listed22
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesAudio, File, Image, Text, VideoAudio, File, Image, Text, Video
First listed19 February 202613 October 2026
PublisherGoogleGoogle

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (72%); publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (28%); shrunk 3.7 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon

Public benchmark boards where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 4 Argon has a published result
BoardGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGemini 4 ArgonLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14871484–1490Not reported—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15221518–1527—Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-2.8%-4.0%–-1.6%—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis29.7Reasoning52.6HighGemini 4 Argon
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis73.8%Reasoning—Only one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis95.6%Reasoning—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis47.0%Reasoning57.1%HighGemini 4 Argon

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon: common questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 13 October 2026: #8 against #33. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper on output tokens: $10.00/1M against $12.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and $2.00/1M for Gemini 4 Argon. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $10.00 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview versus $9.00 for Gemini 4 Argon. Gemini 4 Argon costs 10.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 4 Argon?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Gemini 4 Argon?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon open-weight models?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: No linked weights. Gemini 4 Argon: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Gemini 4 Argon?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 2 for Gemini 4 Argon, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 13 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further