Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ornith 1.5 397B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902), or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ornith 1.5 397B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 9:19:37 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ornith 1.5 397B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Field
ModelCap position#19#5
Index score75.883.2
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 194 held-out anchors (11%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 11 rows (89%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.8 toward the measured corpusMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1MUnavailable$2.00
Output / 1MUnavailable$6.00
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context1M
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Ornith 1.5 397B is #19; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is #5 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 75.8 for Ornith 1.5 397B and 83.2 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902). Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Ornith 1.5 397B is Estimated; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: Ornith 1.5 397B is open; Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ornith 1.5 397B and 1 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902).

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.