Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gpt-oss-120b and Falcon H1 34B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gpt-oss-120b vs Falcon H1 34B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/19/2026, 11:04:59 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gpt-oss-120b and Falcon H1 34B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#124#122
Index score38.940.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 195 held-out anchors (48%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (52%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 11.6 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.15Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.60Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K
Providers200
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • gpt-oss-120b is #124; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is #122 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 38.9 for gpt-oss-120b and 40.0 for Falcon H1 34B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: gpt-oss-120b is Measured; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: gpt-oss-120b is open; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 20 providers for gpt-oss-120b and 0 for Falcon H1 34B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.