Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with gpt-oss-120b and o4 Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
gpt-oss-120b vs o4 Mini
Live dataset updated 11/7/2026, 2:00:08 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | gpt-oss-120b OpenAI | o4 Mini OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #164 | #136 |
| Index score | 39.6 | 49.0 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.015 | $0.55 |
| Output / 1M | $0.057 | $2.20 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 131K | 200K |
| Providers | 22 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | No linked weights |
Decision facts
- gpt-oss-120b is #164; o4 Mini is #136 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 39.6 for gpt-oss-120b and 49.0 for o4 Mini. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.06 for gpt-oss-120b and $2.20 for o4 Mini. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.06 for gpt-oss-120b versus $2.20 for o4 Mini. gpt-oss-120b costs 97.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 131,072 tokens for gpt-oss-120b and 200,000 for o4 Mini.
- Weight access differs: gpt-oss-120b is open; o4 Mini is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 22 providers for gpt-oss-120b and 1 for o4 Mini.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3#1 vs #11 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #11 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs Kimi K3#3 vs #11 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.