Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Luna, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Luna

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 10:37:09 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Luna
Field
ModelCap position#34#25
Index score71.978.6
EvidenceMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.75$0.10
Output / 1M$4.50$0.50
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context400K1M
Providers22
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only

Decision facts

  • GPT-5.4 Mini is #34; GPT-6 Luna is #25 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 71.9 for GPT-5.4 Mini and 78.6 for GPT-6 Luna. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $4.50 for GPT-5.4 Mini and $0.50 for GPT-6 Luna. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $3.75 for GPT-5.4 Mini versus $0.45 for GPT-6 Luna. GPT-6 Luna costs 88.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
  • Published context is 400,000 tokens for GPT-5.4 Mini and 1,050,000 for GPT-6 Luna.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.