Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GPT-4o-mini and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GPT-4o-mini vs Qwen Drive 1.0 4B

Live dataset updated 9/19/2026, 11:04:59 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GPT-4o-mini and Qwen Drive 1.0 4B
Field
ModelCap position#132#129
Index score35.938.7
EvidenceMeasuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 195 held-out anchors (60%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (40%); shrunk 22.3 up toward the measured corpusInheritedfinetune of Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B · finetune (100%)
Input / 1M$0.15Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.60Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context128K
Providers20
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • GPT-4o-mini is #132; Qwen Drive 1.0 4B is #129 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 35.9 for GPT-4o-mini and 38.7 for Qwen Drive 1.0 4B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: GPT-4o-mini is Measured; Qwen Drive 1.0 4B is Inherited.
  • Weight access differs: GPT-4o-mini is none; Qwen Drive 1.0 4B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GPT-4o-mini and 0 for Qwen Drive 1.0 4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.