Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and o4 Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs o4 Mini
Live dataset updated 10/18/2026, 4:49:00 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) OpenAI | o4 Mini OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #185 | #116 |
| Index score | 36.8 | 49.6 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards |
| Input / 1M | $2.50 | $1.10 |
| Output / 1M | $10.00 | $4.40 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 128K | 200K |
| Providers | 2 | 1 |
| Weight access | No linked weights | No linked weights |
Decision facts
- GPT-4o (2024-08-06) is #185; o4 Mini is #116 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 36.8 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 49.6 for o4 Mini. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and $4.40 for o4 Mini. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $10.00 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) versus $4.40 for o4 Mini. o4 Mini costs 56.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 200,000 for o4 Mini.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 1 for o4 Mini.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#5 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon#10 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#2 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#3 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.