Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and GPT-6 Luna, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GPT-6 Luna
Live dataset updated 11/7/2026, 12:54:46 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) OpenAI | GPT-6 Luna OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #192 | #53 |
| Index score | 36.4 | 67.6 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards |
| Input / 1M | $2.50 | $0.10 |
| Output / 1M | $10.00 | $0.50 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Providers | 2 | 3 |
| Weight access | No linked weights | No linked weights |
Decision facts
- GPT-4o (2024-08-06) is #192; GPT-6 Luna is #53 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 36.4 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 67.6 for GPT-6 Luna. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $10.00 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and $0.50 for GPT-6 Luna. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $10.00 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) versus $0.45 for GPT-6 Luna. GPT-6 Luna costs 95.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 1,050,000 for GPT-6 Luna.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 3 for GPT-6 Luna.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#6 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#1 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon#10 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#3 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.