Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Live dataset updated 9/19/2026, 11:04:59 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
Field
ModelCap position#103#101
Index score48.348.5
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b · finetune (100%)Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.12
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.80
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers04
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is #103; Qwen3 Coder Next is #101 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 48.3 for Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and 48.5 for Qwen3 Coder Next. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is Inherited; Qwen3 Coder Next is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is restricted; Qwen3 Coder Next is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B and 4 for Qwen3 Coder Next.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.