Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Mistral Medium 3.5 and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Live dataset updated 11/7/2026, 2:00:08 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #79 | #300 |
| Index score | 61.3 | 15.4 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | $1.50 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M | $7.50 | $6.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 66K |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Weight access | No linked weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is #79; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is #300 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 61.3 for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 15.4 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5 and $6.00 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $6.75 for Mistral Medium 3.5 versus $7.00 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 3.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 65,536 for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct.
- Weight access differs: Mistral Medium 3.5 is none; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct is open.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K3#1 vs #11 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #11 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs Kimi K3#3 vs #11 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.