Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with MiniMax M3 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
MiniMax M3 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Live dataset updated 10/19/2026, 6:04:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | MiniMax M3 MiniMax | MiniMax M3.1 Flash MiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #49 | #44 |
| Index score | 66.9 | 68.5 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Estimated1 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (68%); publisher-corpus-prior over 213 held-out anchors (32%); shrunk 8.2 toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.30 | Free |
| Output / 1M | $1.20 | Free |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Providers | 13 | 1 |
| Weight access | Restricted license | No linked weights |
Decision facts
- MiniMax M3 is #49; MiniMax M3.1 Flash is #44 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 66.9 for MiniMax M3 and 68.5 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: MiniMax M3 is Measured; MiniMax M3.1 Flash is Estimated.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.20 for MiniMax M3 and $0 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for MiniMax M3 versus $0 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 100.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for MiniMax M3 and 1,000,000 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash.
- Weight access differs: MiniMax M3 is restricted; MiniMax M3.1 Flash is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 13 providers for MiniMax M3 and 1 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#5 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon#10 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#2 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#3 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.