Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Llama 4 Scout and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 9:19:37 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Llama 4 Scout Meta | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #162 | #168 |
| Index score | 27.0 | 23.7 |
| Evidence | Measured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.05 |
| Output / 1M | $0.30 | $0.20 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1.3M | 262K |
| Providers | 3 | 4 |
| Weight access | Gated access | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- Llama 4 Scout is #162; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is #168 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 27.0 for Llama 4 Scout and 23.7 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.30 for Llama 4 Scout and $0.20 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.35 for Llama 4 Scout versus $0.20 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 42.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,310,720 tokens for Llama 4 Scout and 262,144 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
- Weight access differs: Llama 4 Scout is gated; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 3 providers for Llama 4 Scout and 4 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.