Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with LongCat Flash Chat and GPT-5.4 Nano, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

LongCat Flash Chat vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Live dataset updated 9/19/2026, 11:04:59 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of LongCat Flash Chat and GPT-5.4 Nano
Field
LongCat Flash Chat

Meituan Longcat

ModelCap position#77#80
Index score54.852.6
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 195 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 12 rows (91%); exceeds every named peer on 2 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.2 toward the measured corpusMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.20
Output / 1MUnavailable$1.25
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context400K
Providers02
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • LongCat Flash Chat is #77; GPT-5.4 Nano is #80 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 54.8 for LongCat Flash Chat and 52.6 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: LongCat Flash Chat is Estimated; GPT-5.4 Nano is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: LongCat Flash Chat is open; GPT-5.4 Nano is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for LongCat Flash Chat and 2 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.