Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with LongCat Flash Chat and MiniMax M1 80k, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

LongCat Flash Chat vs MiniMax M1 80k

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 8:34:26 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of LongCat Flash Chat and MiniMax M1 80k
Field
LongCat Flash Chat

Meituan Longcat

ModelCap position#65#77
Index score54.351.2
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 193 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 12 rows (91%); exceeds every named peer on 2 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.2 toward the measured corpusEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 193 held-out anchors (20%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 9 rows (80%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 9 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.2 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context—1M
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • LongCat Flash Chat is #65; MiniMax M1 80k is #77 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 54.3 for LongCat Flash Chat and 51.2 for MiniMax M1 80k. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.