Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with UI Venus 2 9B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

UI Venus 2 9B vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/19/2026, 11:04:59 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of UI Venus 2 9B and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Field
UI Venus 2 9B

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#117#120
Index score41.341.0
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-9b · finetune (100%)Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 195 held-out anchors (17%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 4 rows (83%); exceeds every named peer on 2 of 4 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.1 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessLicense unverifiedOpen weights

Decision facts

  • UI Venus 2 9B is #117; Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is #120 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 41.3 for UI Venus 2 9B and 41.0 for Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: UI Venus 2 9B is Inherited; Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: UI Venus 2 9B is unknown; Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.