Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with K2 Horizon 32B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

K2 Horizon 32B vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Live dataset updated 9/17/2026, 7:03:55 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of K2 Horizon 32B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Field
ModelCap position#97#98
Index score47.847.4
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 197 held-out anchors (49%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 8 rows (51%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 8 rows; optimism haircut 1.3 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 3.3 up toward the measured corpusMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.30
Output / 1MUnavailable$1.00
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context262K
Providers05
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • K2 Horizon 32B is #97; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is #98 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 47.8 for K2 Horizon 32B and 47.4 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: K2 Horizon 32B is Estimated; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for K2 Horizon 32B and 5 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.