Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E4B it and Gemma 4 26B A4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E4B it vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Live dataset updated 11/7/2026, 2:00:08 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E4B it and Gemma 4 26B A4B
Field
ModelCap position#238#55
Index score30.267.3
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.068
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.225
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context33K262K
Providers015
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E4B it is #238; Gemma 4 26B A4B is #55 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 30.2 for gemma 3n E4B it and 67.3 for Gemma 4 26B A4B. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 32,768 tokens for gemma 3n E4B it and 262,144 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E4B it is gated; Gemma 4 26B A4B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 3n E4B it and 15 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.