Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E2B it and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E2B it vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 9:19:37 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E2B it and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Field
ModelCap position#176#167
Index score22.124.0
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3n-E4B-it · finetune (100%)Inheritedfinetune of openai/gpt-oss-20b · fp4 (100%)
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.075
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.30
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—131K
Providers01
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E2B it is #176; gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is #167 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.1 for gemma 3n E2B it and 24.0 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Inherited evidence.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E2B it is gated; gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 3n E2B it and 1 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.